By Robert Robbins | CatholicEclipsed.com
“We cannot prevent the Jews from going to Jerusalem, but we could never sanction it.” — Pope St. Pius X to Theodor Herzl, 1904
The Middle East is a mess. Again.
Israel is in the headlines. Again.
And Catholics, yet again, are caught between parroting Protestant end-times hysteria or virtue-signaling Vatican II ecumenism.
But what if I told you that neither option is Catholic? What if I told you that before the aggiornamento of the 1960s, the Catholic Church had a well-developed, sober, and spiritually sound position on the Jewish state—one that didn’t involve reading the Book of Revelation like a tabloid or kissing the diplomatic ring of the UN?
Let’s go back. Before the New Mass. Before Nostra Aetate. Before the State of Israel flew its first flag.
📜 A Quick History of the Modern State of Israel (for Context)
Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948, following the United Nations’ 1947 partition plan. Zionist leaders, led by David Ben-Gurion, proclaimed a Jewish homeland in historic Palestine—a land already inhabited by Palestinians, including thousands of Christians.
Now, let’s be clear: This wasn’t the fulfillment of some divine prophecy. This was the geopolitical fruit of Zionism (a 19th-century nationalist movement) combined with the global shock and moral urgency following the Holocaust.
Modern Israel was not born from a burning bush but from diplomatic backroom deals, British betrayal, and international guilt. It was, and remains, a secular nationalist project—not the spiritual revival of Biblical Israel.
So how did the Catholic Church respond?
🏛️ Pre-1958 Catholicism: Not Buying the Zionist Hype
Before Vatican II, the popes weren’t inviting rabbis to address the Synod or lighting menorahs in St. Peter’s Square. They also weren’t blind to the spiritual and political consequences of a Jewish state in the Holy Land. Here’s how the realCatholic Church—the one before the ecumenical revolution—thought about Israel.
1. Theology: The New Israel Is the Church
At the heart of the Catholic worldview lies supersessionism—the belief that the Church is the New Israel.
The Old Covenant? Fulfilled in Christ.
The Promised Land? Now the spiritual inheritance of all who are baptized.
The Temple? Destroyed in A.D. 70 as a divine punctuation mark.
No pope prior to John XXIII ever interpreted Scripture to suggest the Jews would return to Palestine as part of God’s plan. That interpretation was Protestant, modernist, and eschatologically confused. Evangelical Christians today might gush over modern Israel like it’s the opening act to the Second Coming, but the traditional Catholic mind knew better.
2. Pope Pius X vs. Theodor Herzl: The Original “No”
When Theodor Herzl, the founder of political Zionism, met with Pope St. Pius X in 1904 to seek Catholic approval for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, he was firmly rebuffed.
“We cannot prevent the Jews from going to Jerusalem,” said the Holy Father, “but we could never sanction it.”
Why?
Because Jerusalem is a Catholic city. It is sanctified not by Abraham or Moses, but by Christ Crucified and Risen. A political takeover by Jews who reject Christ would, in the eyes of the Church, be a spiritual tragedy—not a triumph.
Pius X was not being antisemitic. He was being Catholic. And that’s a distinction modern ears struggle to understand.
3. Diplomatic Caution, Not Political Enthusiasm
The Holy See under Benedict XV and Pius XI maintained a careful neutrality, not because it was spineless, but because it had to safeguard Christian minorities in the region. These were real people—not symbols—who would be caught in the crossfire of a Zionist-Arab conflict.
In fact, the Church was opposed to the 1917 Balfour Declaration, where Britain pledged support for a Jewish homeland. The Vatican feared this would inflame tensions with Muslims and marginalize Christians already struggling in the region.
When Pius XII reigned during Israel’s declaration of independence in 1948, he did not rush to recognize the new state. Instead, he issued the encyclical In Multiplicibus Curis, calling for the internationalization of Jerusalem, so no one nation could claim it—and desecrate it.
He wasn’t being political. He was being prudent.
4. Humanitarian Concerns: The Forgotten Palestinians
Let’s not forget: the founding of Israel displaced over 700,000 Palestinians—many of them Christians. Entire villages were emptied. Churches shuttered. The Church saw the 1948 Arab-Israeli War not as a holy war, but as a humanitarian disaster.
The Vatican called for the protection of all religious communities—not just Jews. It feared that Israeli control would mean Christians losing access to their own holy sites—and it was right.
Today, Christians are a tiny and shrinking minority in the Holy Land, often caught between the secular Zionist government and Islamic pressures. Where’s the media outrage for them?
✝️ So What’s the Catholic Position Today?
That depends on which Catholic Church you mean.
The post-1958 Church, influenced by Vatican II and the document Nostra Aetate, walked back centuries of theological clarity. It emphasized dialogue over doctrine and rebranded Judaism as a “big brother” faith. By 1993, the Vatican officially recognized the State of Israel—a move driven more by diplomatic realism than theological conviction.
But the pre-Vatican II Church? The Church of Pius X, Pius XI, and Pius XII?
She said: No political restoration of the Jews can replace their spiritual return to Christ.
And she was right.
🧭 What Should Traditional Catholics Think?
As Catholics striving to remain faithful to the perennial Magisterium, we must reject the false binary of either blindly supporting Israel because it’s “Biblical” or condemning it based on emotional activism.
We must view Israel through the lens of Catholic theology and Catholic diplomacy—not Protestant prophecy charts or modern liberal guilt.
- The Church is the true Israel.
- Christ is the true Temple.
- The Holy Land belongs to Christendom—not nationalism.
Let’s pray for peace. Let’s defend persecuted Christians in the Middle East. But let us never mistake geopolitical Zionism for the will of God.
It amazes me that people in general would think that the same group of people who screamed ‘crucify Him and His blood be on us AND OUR CHILDREN’.. would then believe that these same people are somehow ‘God’s chosen people’ CUZ THEY SAY SO..doesn’t this type of thinking meet the definition of ‘stupid’..??
LikeLike
Yes, Jack, I think so. And it is dangerously stupidity, because one’s eternal salvation is at stake.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Robert Robbins, nice article. Agree with everything you have written. May God bless you.
LikeLike
Thank you for reading. Hopefully you have gotten some good from doing so.
LikeLike
The above comment is from me, I don’t know why it showed as anonymouse.Once again than you & God bless you, Robert.
LikeLike